King Charles Abdication Rumours: What Did He Know About Andrew?
- Debi Evans
- 4 days ago
- 2 min read
In the wake of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's explosive arrest on February 19, 2026, tied to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, speculation about King Charles III's future has reached fever pitch. With the monarchy facing its "gravest test in decades," calls for abdication are echoing from royal experts to public polls, but palace insiders insist the King isn't going anywhere.

The crisis deepened with a bombshell Daily Mail exclusive revealing the then Prince Charles was warned in 2019 about Andrew's "secret deals." A whistleblower email, sent via royal lawyers, flagged how financier David Rowland was allegedly "abusing the Royal Family's name" through Andrew's business ties. The alert claimed Andrew prioritised Rowland over family, with evidence of financial favours like a £1.5 million loan to the duke in 2017. This drags Charles into the spotlight: What did he know, and why wasn't action taken sooner?
Royal historian Andrew Lownie argues the scandal could force Charles to "stand aside" if palace cover-ups emerge, especially amid the King's ongoing cancer treatment. "It's a crunch point for the monarchy," Lownie said, suggesting William offers a "clean slate." In the coming months, perhaps the King’s health will deteriorate necessitating an abdication in favour of younger blue blood?
Polls show public support waning: 25% now favour abolishing the monarchy, up 10% in a decade, with 50% doubting its survival in 50 years.
BUT abdication isn't straightforward. Unlike Edward VIII's 1936 exit, Charles would sign an instrument and inform the Prime Minister privately, no parliamentary vote needed, but immense pressure could sway him. This is just the tip of the iceberg. There is far more to come.
Is Charles "your king"? In a constitutional monarchy, he remains head of state until he chooses otherwise. But with trust eroding, likened to crises from Diana's death to the Glorious Revolution, the question isn't just if he should go, but if the institution can endure without change. For now, Buckingham Palace holds firm: The King stays.
What thinks you? Will the monarchy survive, or indeed do you want it to survive?




Comments